A franchisor does not stand in an employment or agency relationship with the franchisee and its employees for purposes of holding it vicariously liable for workplace injuries allegedly inflicted by one employee of a franchisee while supervising another employee of the franchisee, where the franchisor did not, as a matter of contract or in fact, control the employment policies of the franchisee.
Patterson v. Domino’s Pizza, LLC – filed August 28, 2014
Related Posts
November 23, 2021
Money Lost and Found – Show Me The Money!
September 21, 2021
College Student Legal Needs
September 14, 2021
Grandparents Have Rights
August 12, 2021
Social Media Content is Discoverable
July 28, 2021
California Law Regarding Expert Witnesses
May 13, 2021
Independent Contractors vs Employees
March 30, 2021
Bankruptcy FAQs
February 24, 2021
COVID-19 Liability Waivers
December 16, 2020
COVID-19 Spike Shuts Down Jury Trials Again
December 12, 2020
Proposition 22’s Impact on Rideshare Drivers
December 5, 2020
Community Spotlight – Sarah Ornelas
December 2, 2020
Frequent Reports to Protect the Trustee
November 21, 2020
Real Estate FAQ
November 12, 2020
Co-Parenting During COVID-19
November 7, 2020
Alternative Disputes Resolution in the Age of COVID-19
October 16, 2020
What is a Will?
October 2, 2020
What are the Current DACA Updates as of September 2020?
September 29, 2020
Community Spotlight – Mark Shem
September 23, 2020
Community Spotlight – Michael Stump
September 22, 2020
Dissolution and Retirement Plans
September 17, 2020
Bankruptcy While Serving in the Military
September 8, 2020
New U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Fee Schedule
September 2, 2020
Community Spotlight – Cal Stead
August 26, 2020
Community Spotlight – Ken Rutan
August 21, 2020
Community Spotlight – Fred Begun
August 19, 2020
The End of the COVID-19 Emergency Eviction Moratorium
July 30, 2020
Community Spotlight – Claudia Aceves
July 1, 2020
Green Card for Victims of Domestic Abuse
June 10, 2020
Recent Information by the USCIS
June 8, 2020
Why Should I Incorporate My Business
May 21, 2020
Bankruptcy FAQ
May 7, 2020
Domestic Violence During COVID-19
April 20, 2020
What Reopening the Economy Means for Employers
April 17, 2020
Child Support During COVID-19
April 13, 2020
Child Custody & Visitation During COVID-19
April 10, 2020
COVID-19 and Employers: Quick Key Facts
March 19, 2019
120 Years of Serving California
March 18, 2019
Congratulations Claudia Aceves!
March 1, 2019
Congratulations Sarah Ornelas
February 28, 2019
Congratulations to Kelley Reid!
February 11, 2019
Welcome to the Team
February 7, 2019
Welcome to the Team
October 23, 2018
Welcome to the Team
September 28, 2018
ACA Compliance Seminar
September 27, 2018
Welcome to our Team
September 25, 2018
Family Law Training
September 25, 2018
Success Stories
January 18, 2018
McMillin Albany, LLC v. Superior Court (Van Tassel)
April 6, 2017
Your Independent Contractors Can Get You in Trouble
April 6, 2017
Recent Appellate Decisions – Spring 2017
March 2, 2017
Successful Appeal from Administrative Order
On February 27, 2017, Andrew Morgan of the Bakersfield Office
February 9, 2017
National Trucking Companies Beware
A new California case that addresses property disputes will
December 12, 2016
New Elliott Homes Case Sides with Home Builders in Statewide SB800 Debate
Through its published opinion Elliott Homes, Inc. v. Superior Court (Hicks), the Third District Court of Appeal has added its voice to the statewide debate, which is presently pending
November 23, 2016
Injunction on Overtime Laws
Yesterday, a federal judge ordered that the US Department of Labor stay implementation of the new overtime laws at the request of 21 states.
October 5, 2016
Valle Central Familia Derecho
Nuestra oficina de Modesto ofrece servicios en los condados de Estanislao, San Joaquín, Calaveras, Alameda y Tuolumne.
October 5, 2016
Ley de Bancarrota
October 5, 2016
California Budget Crisis
While the economy has improved, the Governor has not increased funding to the judiciary to pre-recession levels.
October 5, 2016
Cases
In Golden v. California Emergency Physicians Medical Group 782 F.3d. 1083 (9th Cir. 2015)
October 5, 2016
Haniff or Howell Deductions for Medical Expenses
The basis for recover in tort is codified in California Civil Code § 3333.
October 5, 2016
Laws Effective 1/1/16
As of January 1, 2016, several new laws went into effect as of January 1, 2016.
October 5, 2016
Insured Builder Entitled to Counsel of Choice
Insured Builder Entitled to Counsel of Choice -- by Calvin R. Stead, Esq.
October 5, 2016
Recovery of Expert Fees after Voluntary Dismissal
Recovery of Expert Fees after Voluntary Dismissal -- by Calvin R. Stead, Esq.
October 4, 2016
Verdict for Hall Ambulance
March 2013 - Borton Petrini Obtains Defense Verdict for Hall Ambulance
October 4, 2016
Premises Liability Case
March 2014 – Los Angeles Partner Obtains Defense Verdict in Premises Liability Case
October 4, 2016
Appellate Ruling
Appellate Ruling on SB800 Right to Repair and Homeowners’ Exclusive Remedy Expected Soon
October 4, 2016
Fifth District Court of Appeal
Borton Petrini Persuades Fifth District Court of Appeal to Reject Fourth District’s Liberty Mutual Opinion
November 10, 2014
William H. Cantrell
William H. Cantrell was the Firm Managing Partner of Borton Petrini, LLP, from 2001-2007.
December 19, 2008
John F. Petrini
John F. Petrini was a Capital Partner in Borton Petrini, LLPʼs Bakersfield office.